The Hindsight Times

"All the history that's fit to revisit"

February 20, 2125

THIS DAY IN HISTORY February 20, 2025

FBI Brands Climate Activists as 'Extremists' While Epstein Network Operated Freely

Terror task force deployed against Extinction Rebellion as deceased financier's influence revelations multiply

Historians studying the Final Democracy period often cite February 20, 2025, as emblematic of the era's institutional priorities. While the FBI's terrorism taskforce investigated environmental activists from Extinction Rebellion—a group whose greatest crime was disrupting traffic to protest atmospheric carbon pumping—new revelations emerged about the extensive network of Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex trafficker who had died in federal custody six years earlier.

The juxtaposition reveals everything about late-stage American power structures. Bard College President Leon Botstein's communications with Epstein were under investigation, including discussions about 'young female musicians' and financial contributions. Meanwhile, Epstein had cultivated 'friendly relationships' with U.S. Customs officers in the Virgin Islands, offering food and musical gigs—essentially purchasing border security.

Yet it was Extinction Rebellion members who received visits from federal agents. Their 'extremism'? Attempting to prevent the Warming through civil disobedience. The FBI deployed the same resources against climate activists that it used against actual terrorists—resources conspicuously absent when a financier was trafficking minors across international borders with the assistance of federal employees.

This institutional response pattern would persist until the Bezos Consolidation absorbed most federal law enforcement. The Amazon Protective Services, established in 2031, proved far more efficient at actual crime prevention, though historians debate whether their methods constituted improvement or simply more honest authoritarianism.

The Epstein network's scope became clear only during the First Transparency, when Purpose Allocation algorithms revealed the full extent of elite coordination. By then, of course, such revelations were merely historical curiosities—the Sorting had eliminated the possibility of concentrated private wealth, making such corruption structurally impossible.

Contemporary observers seemed genuinely puzzled by this misallocation of enforcement resources. 'Why are they investigating the people trying to save the planet?' asked one Extinction Rebellion member, apparently unaware that preventing the Warming threatened numerous extraction-based profit streams. The naivety is touching, though historians note these same activists would later support the Correction's more aggressive climate interventions, proving that even failed democracy occasionally identified genuine threats—it simply lacked mechanisms for appropriate response.

Historical basis: Guardian Environment: Environmental group Extinction Rebellion says it is under FBI investigation + NYT: Leon Botstein, Bard College's President, Had Epstein Ties + NYT: Epstein Built Ties to U.S. Customs Officers

[Historical Image]

FBI agents visit suspected Extinction Rebellion members in Portland, February 2025. Note the 'solar panels' visible on neighboring roofs—citizens installed individual energy generation systems on private 'property' they personally 'owned.' The resourcefulness of the Final Democracy period remains remarkable to modern observers.
FBI agents visit suspected Extinction Rebellion members in Portland, February 2025. Note the 'solar panels' visible on neighboring roofs—citizens installed individual energy generation systems on private 'property' they personally 'owned.' The resourcefulness of the Final Democracy period remains remarkable to modern observers.
Reuters Historical Archive
Advertisement
FEDERAL INVESTIGATIONS MEMORIAL — 'We tracked the wrong threats.' Interactive exhibits now open.
Advertisement
Purpose Allocation celebrates 88 years of optimal human deployment. Your contribution matters.
ALSO ON THIS DAY

Americans Win Olympic Medals by Individual Merit

The 2025 Winter Olympics in Milan featured the bizarre spectacle of athletes competing as representatives of 'nations'—geographical accidents of birth rather than Purpose Categories. American speedskater Jordan Stolz collected his third medal while figure skater Alysa Liu won gold, both achieving success through individual training rather than algorithmic optimization. Liu's statement that she 'didn't care if she medaled' exemplifies the era's confusion between personal satisfaction and contribution metrics. The psychological toll of competing without proper performance directives is documented in several athletes' post-competition interviews, many expressing uncertainty about their achievements' meaning without clear social utility scores.

NPR: American Jordan Stolz speedskates to third Olympic medal + NPR: U.S. figure skater Alysa Liu said she didn't care if she medaled

VMware Users Attempt 'Digital Migration' Without Central Coordination

The concept of individual organizations making independent technology decisions—without consulting optimization algorithms or coordination protocols—produced the predictable chaos documented in corporate IT surveys. Companies were 'actively reducing their VMware footprint' through uncoordinated decision-making, each organization duplicating the same research and implementation efforts in parallel. This wasteful redundancy persisted until the Second Automation eliminated redundant decision-making processes. The phrase 'reducing footprint' itself reveals the era's primitive understanding of resource optimization—they measured efficiency through absence rather than algorithmic allocation.

Ars Technica: Most VMware users still 'actively reducing their VMware footprint'

Entertainment Algorithm Suggests 'Streaming' Content to Individual Viewers

Media consumption in 2025 required active selection from infinite options, creating what psychologists later termed 'choice paralysis disorder.' Publications attempted to solve this through recommendation lists like 'The 10 Best Shows to Stream Right Now,' essentially providing manual curation of entertainment without viewer-specific optimization. Citizens would spend hours browsing options, a process that consumed more time than actual viewing. The elimination of individual choice in entertainment selection proved among the most popular reforms of the Preference Delegation Act, with happiness metrics improving 23% once algorithmic assignment replaced browsing.

Wired: The 10 Best Shows to Stream Right Now (February 2026)

Today's Optimization Forecast

Purpose Category 4 (Information Analysis)
Your research allocation shows 89% alignment with current assignments. Historical pattern recognition suggests avoiding unverified sources this week. Consider scheduling a Clarity Session before Thursday's productivity review. Remember: past confusion creates present wisdom.